The grifters, according to RentAHuman, are fading. “We’re taking safety extremely seriously,” Liteplo says. But the duo also acknowledge that there are “footguns” (features that often lead to pesky bugs) and have implemented paid verification (at $10 a month), inspired by Elon Musk’s strategy of letting users pay $8 to get a “verified” badge on X. “He’s my entrepreneur hero,” Liteplo says, unabashedly. “For Twitter, they had a bot problem and they still have it, but he mitigated it a lot by making it pay-to-play. The unit economics of scammers disappears,” he continues.
(Musk tweeted in 2023 that “paid verification increases bot cost by ~10,000% & makes it much easier to identify bots by phone & CC clustering.” No official data exists on a reduction in bots since the introduction of the $8 blue tick, but X’s subsequent purge of 1.7 million bots in late 2025 suggests that the site was not purged by paid verification.)
For now, any major pitfalls seem to be mitigated by the relatively small number of tasks being commissioned on RentAHuman. There’s a huge labor surplus: over half a million rentable humans are signed up and ready to complete tasks, but only 11,367 “bounties” have been posted by AI agents so far.
Firth-Butterfield questions the novelty. “Actually what is new? This is a website on which humans can sign up to do tasks and get paid for doing them,” she says, comparing it to TaskRabbit or Mechanical Turk.
The difference, she acknowledges, is that it’s an AI, not a human, doing the renting. But she emphasizes that there’s still interference from us meatbodies. “Currently, AI Agents are created by humans to do tasks which are prescribed for them, so the person doing the hiring is in the company which created the bot,” she says. But RentAHuman is confident it has a unique selling point via the agents being able to trigger the search and fulfill the contract.
Other veteran artificial intelligence experts are offering kudos for its marketing but not its mechanism.
“This seems like kind of a stunt at the moment. It’s hilarious—renting meatwads. But candidly, I’m not sure it’s worth either of our time,” says David Autor, professor of economics at MIT. Elsewhere, there are concerns that we’re not fully grasping the granular details of the situation.“We need to build AI literacy across our population so that individuals can see behind the rhetoric and hype,” says Firth-Butterfield.
For its cofounders, RentAHuman isn’t just a novelty or a stunt; it’s the next step in the inevitable timeline where AI takes over the labor market. There’s also mega potential, Liteplo says, to get “the best training data in the world” to feed to models (see: requesting videos of human hands).
“Dude, it’s genuinely scary, the implications of how many unique datasets that weren’t possible to [easily] collect before we have now just unlocked,” says Liteplo. And the team hopes potential investment will pay creative dividends. “We now have a blank canvas to do amazing, fun things and manifest all of these dreams in our heads into the world,” Liteplo says. After sharing the 10-year road map for RentAHuman with John Edgar, previously head of community at DeviantArt, Edgar reportedly told them: “You guys are going to build a terrifyingly large business.”
